Look at this statistic. Damning isn’t it? There’s just one problem – there doesn’t seem to be a creditable source for it, despite it appearing in mainstream media. It appears to be fake news.
This brings together research and inclusion, so I wanted to know more. It's an apparently sound piece of evidence, and quoted in many – often respectable - places.
But always without a link to the original research. This is something I see quite a lot. It means there’s no evidence of how it was collected, with who, the questions asked or the tests conducted.
That’s the price of speed of information. That’s how the world operates. 24 hour rolling news is “never wrong for long”. Trouble is, that’s not how it works at work. If you’re gathering evidence for a proposal or to support a change of systems in the workplace, you can’t afford to be embarrassed by dodgy facts. You can’t simply print a correction at the bottom of page 16.
Found a killer stat? One that supports your case? One that inspires you to make changes? Somehow stats like this one have a habit of bouncing around being re-reported and re-parroted out. Just take time to go back to the original evidence, and satisfy yourself that it stands up.
inclusion research facts
Thoughts, ideas and occasional practical suggestions from Sam Monteath @ Reason Why www.reasonwhy.uk / sam@reasonwhy.uk / +44(0)7949 970250
Tuesday, 7 May 2019
Research and Fake News
Look at this statistic. Damning isn’t it? There’s just one problem – there doesn’t seem to be a creditable source for it, despite it appearing in mainstream media. It appears to be fake news.
This brings together research and inclusion, so I wanted to know more. It's an apparently sound piece of evidence, and quoted in many – often respectable - places.
But always without a link to the original research. This is something I see quite a lot. It means there’s no evidence of how it was collected, with who, the questions asked or the tests conducted.
That’s the price of speed of information. That’s how the world operates. 24 hour rolling news is “never wrong for long”. Trouble is, that’s not how it works at work. If you’re gathering evidence for a proposal or to support a change of systems in the workplace, you can’t afford to be embarrassed by dodgy facts. You can’t simply print a correction at the bottom of page 16.
Found a killer stat? One that supports your case? One that inspires you to make changes? Somehow stats like this one have a habit of bouncing around being re-reported and re-parroted out. Just take time to go back to the original evidence, and satisfy yourself that it stands up.
inclusion research facts
I don’t believe in annual engagement surveys
I do, truly, believe in the greatest number of the most engaged
people.
Annual surveys are percentages, dashboards, benchmarks. Just numbers.
Which don’t tell you:
- why your employees think how they do
- what to do next
There’s three main problems:
- Lack of Voice:
You canvas broad opinion from staff. But waste their energy answering YOUR questions. What would THEIR questions be? What’s most important? How would they innovate / improve? - Reliance on
Benchmarks:
No external organisation is like yours, all are on a different journey. That benchmark is irrelevant AND perhaps grants permission to be average, not excellent. Who wants to be average? - Measuring the wrong thing:
You want greater productivity, more sales, better customer experience, longer employee tenure etc. Surveys measure elements of engagement (and don’t all agree). It’s Goodhart’s Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." You try to improve the measure, not what makes you a better organisation.
AND they may not feel a safe space, don’t get leadership
commitment, aren’t shared back openly and take too damn long.
I believe in employee opinion. But with human
interaction, and with a true voice for how their experience can be better and
how your organisation can improve.
What do you think? What’s your experience?
Friday, 26 January 2018
You should be dancing (yeah)
The e-mail pings. The phone buzzes, and skirls across the desk. It’s a new project.
How do you react? Freeze, flight or flight?
Or… do you step away from your desk and do a little dance?
As an employee in a number of large organisations, I wasn’t
dancing. Some places, and times, were dancier than others, but in general, new
work wasn’t something to get too excited about. Most often it just added to a
to-do-list that already daunted me.
I didn’t feel that a new piece of work was a pat on the
back. It give me that recognition or feedback that I was credible, expert or
reliable. And however diligent I was, did I genuinely connect that piece of
work and my next wage slip?
No. Too often new work was an inconvenience. That virtuous
circle of work/purpose/reward was broken.
I run my own business now – and work can be a chore at
times. Not all of it is glamourous, some can be a little rote at times. And a
new piece might land when I’d planned another project, or was going to work on
new business, or I was going to finish early of a Friday and slope off to the
Beer Shed.
But every new piece of work is a celebration, and there is a
genuine, actual, physical dance for each one. (And a bonus twitter gif too.)
Now, some of those dances are not much more than a shimmy-and-slide;
maybe it’s just a days’ work, it’s not too challenging, the results won’t shake
anyone’s world. But some of them are a full-on freestyle freak-out – it’s great
work, I want to get stuck in, I can immerse myself in it and produce some crucial,
insight-driven recommendations.
The purpose is back, I can see the link to reward, and the
work is better for it.
I never realised how important it was that work might make
me dance. Now, I can’t imagine work without it.
Monday, 30 October 2017
Why your employee surveys won't tell you what you want to know (and what to do about it)
Employee surveys won’t give you the answers you want.
Why? Partly fatigue. By the time people get your survey,
they’ve already been asked for their feedback, rating and review on 27
different products and services. Online surveys are too easy to put together
and distribute. But that’s just a new sub-problem.
Surveys never have, and never will, give you the answers
you want.
Unless you’re caught up on the whole idea of
benchmarking. And if you are – well, then there’s a whole industry dedicated to
scratching that itch.
Here’s
the problem: You can’t predict all that your people might think.
It makes sense, doesn’t it? If you knew the answers, you wouldn’t
ask the questions.
So, you’re stuck with missing stuff out or asking a
bajillion questions. Missing stuff out sounds like a bad idea, so most people plump
for the bajillion. And then add a few more, just to be sure.
For one, that’s not really playing well to the whole
fatigue issue. For another, you’re still going to miss stuff.
So, here at Monteath Towers, we take a different approach.
We accept that we’ll miss stuff, but instead we want
people to express themselves. We accept that we can’t predict all that your
people might think, so we don’t try. Instead we ask them to tell us it all.
That means we pick only the most crucial fixed/scale
questions. We do want some quant, we might want to see change over time. But
those fixed questions serve another purpose. They are a stimulus and a prompt
for free comment questions.
Because that’s where we see the real value. That’s where
we can say: “Tell us what you really think, what you really want. We’re
listening.”
The fixed questions are then just focussing that
expression in free comment – they’re stimulating thoughts and ideas. They’re the germ of “you
know what really hacks me off…” and “wouldn’t it be brilliant if…”.
It takes longer to analyse, but that’s because there is
more to discover. There are themes to find, but also what truly resonates,
where there is real strength of feeling. There are as-yet-unformed nuggets of
ideas – ones that could be transformative if allowed to blossom. There are
isolated niggles – ones that you could see could undermine all your efforts if
unchecked.
But most of all, it shows you the priorities and what to
investigate further.
Remember, whatever you do: Surveys won’t give you the
answers you want. But they can allow to focus your next efforts with real
precision and insight.
Tuesday, 10 October 2017
Your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind
When trying to
impress or surprise, or sometimes appal, I mention that I hold a Joint Honours
degree in Maths and Physics.
Undertaken following
a series of perfectly avoidable mistakes, I was entirely unsuited to the
course, and it subsequently hasn’t afforded me much advantage in life.
But it entrenched my
passion for number, I won’t accept anything but a fair test, and, well, I love
the process of science.
That’s beautifully
expressed by Lord Kelvin; “…when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of
a meagre and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you
have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of science, whatever the matter may be.”
(Or rather more
drearily by Peter Drucker: “If you can’t
measure it, you can’t improve it”.)
Observing engagement
and communication strategy, there is a consistent lack of measurement.
There may be lack of
capability. There may be a lack of curiosity. There may not be the clout to get
the budget or time to make the measurement. There’s perhaps an unwillingness to
lift the lid.
But this I know. Lift
that lid. Take a look. Measure effects. See what you find. Draw conclusions. And
apply what you’ve learnt. Your clout-o-meter will rise, fast.
Look at what’s most
important to your employees.
See how is best to
reach them
Assess if what you
propose to do will make an impact
Find out if you are
cutting through.
All of this – and
much more in your interactions with your people - is observable, quantifiable
and therefore improvable.
Do more measurement.
But… you can go too
far.
Hold in mind Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
“the
more precisely the position of some particle is determined, the less precisely
its momentum can be known, and vice versa”:
(Or, more mundanely, as
Goodhart’s Law: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good
measure)
Don’t get bogged down
in the number. The number is there to justify the means, to target the message,
to precisely focus the efforts.
Always remember that
it is the powerful word, the galvanising mission and the human interaction that
wins.
That’s what changes behaviour,
generates ideas and unites people to a cause. That builds momentum.
Do more measurement (but always know your
place).
Friday, 22 September 2017
Always Crashing In The Same Car
I’ve paused for the first time in a while. And it’s
good to reflect. When projects come thick and fast, you can drive, or drift, through
in the same way, regardless of previous success.
Do you endlessly offer up offer
Frog a la Peche in the face of all evidence? (Confused? Here’s a link)
This isn’t “I’ve always done it that way”-ism. I
think that’s rather different – albeit a pernicious blocker to achievement. What
I’m talking about is something subtler, and it’s well described in this article. “Our brains don’t learn from our past
mistakes to the extent we might hope. In fact, thinking about past flubs might
only doom us to repeat them”. Sounds worrying, but you might think that
doesn’t happen to you. Yeah? Read this:
“In
2008, researchers at McMaster University in Ontario found a similar problem
took place with “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. “This can be incredibly
frustrating — you know you know the word, but you just can’t quite get it,” the
researcher Karin Humphreys told LiveScience at the time. “And once you have it,
it is such a relief that you can’t imagine ever forgetting it again. But then
you do.” The reason? The time you spend sifting for that word reinforces a
“mistake pathway” in the brain, essentially digging yourself further into the
wrong groove. The next time you’re hunting for the elusive word, your brain
will reflexively draw a blank instead.”
Sounds more familiar now? And if so, have I been
busy burning new mistake pathways? I know that when running research, I have
come to one of my own questions and thought: “Uch, why have I used that? I
always have to rephrase!” And then it turns up again in another design… Or, for
at least a few months, I was analyse data rather laboriously. Previously I’d
done it far more efficiently. Just once I hadn’t been able to make it work, hence
a long-hand workaround. And, it seems, I burned this new path.
But as I reflect, I’ve thought about how I have
learned. At the outset my approach to qualitative was very much set up around
free discussion. That’s my comfort zone. But I recognised some of its limitations;
it’s not others’ comfort zone, it can limit how much some could express themselves,
it can be reliant on people arriving with answers. So, I’ve naturally adapted,
and now design involves a greater mix of written response, small group
exercises, use of stimulus, online groups and others. Next I want to look at
using games, and potentially use of video capture.
That provides a richer insight, and allows me to be
far more flexible in applications. It’s all aspects of the employee experience
– from never-thought-about-them-potential-candidate, to
engaging-the-seen-it-all-before employee, to capturing the collective wisdom of
the workforce.
And you know what – it’s different for me. I’m not
burning down the same pathways, it’s keeping it fresh and less formulaic. And
if I’m on my toes, that’s always going to get a better result.
However busy you may be, keep working on your own
game.
Thursday, 8 June 2017
Five Years: What Have I Learned?
Thanks
to LinkedIn. Without it, I think that the five year anniversary of Monteath
Consulting would have passed me by. Thanks too to everyone that clicked “like”
on that button – small actions can mean a lot.
But
the big question is: what have I learned in five years? What could I teach
other researchers, but more generally, what could I offer to other independent
consultants?
So,
in the modern click-bait style, here’s: Five
things I have learned in five years – you won’t believe number four!
Thing 1: Lots
of ways to get insight, but it’s the human that matters
I
have had to develop many more research techniques. That’s partly for the range
of projects; engagement, internal comms, culture, EVP. But mainly it’s forced
by the range of restrictions. We can’t get a focus group together, we need to
move fast, we can’t use that software, we can’t book a room for 3 months. Etc. I
find new ways to find people and to create environments where they are free to
express themselves: verbally, in writing, with scoring systems, by themselves,
in a group, in reaction to other insight.
That
can generate a lot of data. But no-one wants data, they want insight. I don’t
believe that robots and algorithms can tell you much about human sentiment. Why
did that person answer the question like that? What’s really driving that
behaviour? What didn’t they say? I believe it takes a human to understand
humans. That means hard, manual work – but I’ve worked out neat ways to
shortcut long processes. That gets the most meaningful insight in the shortest
possible time, expressed as the most meaningful numbers, words and real human
emotions.
Because
people want to hear what other people think.
Thing 2: People
give a shit
From
those many projects (c200 of them), what I have heard most is that people care
about where they work and what they do. They might be let down at times by
unclear leadership or poor line management or incomplete communication. But if
they didn’t care it wouldn’t frustrate them so much. People want to do a good
job. They want to get it right for customers, those they offer services to and
their colleagues. And that is an innate motivation; it’s got very little to do
with how much you get paid to do a good job.
It’s
been a great affirmation that people are essentially interested in the greater
good.
Thing 3: Good
work begets good work
I
work most often by myself, and that puts limits on what I can do. Yes, there
are weekends and evenings, and sometimes I do stray into them. But I try to
maintain discipline, because I believe that discipline is necessary to produce
good work. When I wrote my values (a quiet day…) the key line was “I make my
clients look good. Otherwise, why would my clients buy me?”
And
my proudest achievement is that no client has ever used me just once. I have
had repeat business from everyone I have worked with. That’s crucial to
success, and the best affirmation that I’m doing things right.
I
put it down to that discipline, and when you work by yourself you have the best
chance to be able to maintain that discipline.
Thing 4: Sales
never stops
I’ve
had a superb few months, the phone has rung, e-mails have pinged. But however
busy, I need to be out there, having conversations, sharing what I do,
“touching base”, never assuming that because someone is a client now that they
will stay a client. And in the rather niche world in which I operate, it often
takes some time for the opportunity to work with a client. In just the past few
weeks, I’ve started working with clients that I first wooed (oh, and you need
to do the woo-ing, no-one’s going to sweep you off your feet…) 18 months, and I
think about 4.5 years ago respectively. In that time I’ve offered ideas,
completed proposals, shared experiences – and generally been a continual,
unashamed I-want-to-work-with-you presence. This is stuff that, as part of a
bigger agency, I didn’t take nearly as seriously, and relied on the efforts of
others.
When
you work project to project you have to constantly look for the next one.
Thing 5: It
is hard to do it by yourself
I
have had to turn down work recently. And that hurts. But more often I have
worked with some trusted and rather excellent associates to deliver the work.
(You know who you are. Thanks). That makes the offer wider, it means I can say
yes more often and let clients down less.
But
there’s another side to this. When you’re on your own, you are often your only
critic. How do you keep improving, developing new ideas, pushing yourself to
take the work to the next level? How do you hold firm with bold ideas or in the
less busy times?
It’s
probably the biggest challenge that I have faced, and it’s one I haven’t fully
resolved. It’s why, as well some of the informal partnerships, I’m potentially on
the lookout for something more formal. Someone that complements some of my
skills and abilities, and who I can help too. Someone that – together – we can iron
out some of the peaks and troughs. Someone with whom we can achieve real mutual
benefits.
So,
do you know anyone?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


