So, as I’ve described in posts passim, the things in need of attention in research are: understanding of purpose and culture, experience of communication, management and other drivers of engagement.
With a clear picture of this – and a picture over and above an engagement survey - you can uncover two things, which lead me to two more of my hypotheses:
1.
What
it’s important for the organisation to do, and which it delivers on well now.
Which is a decent definition of the EVP – and Hypothesis #8 Most attention by HR depts and their employer marketing agency is spent here. That’s understandable, if there’s a recruitment need, the platform is probably already well ablaze. But it’s the short term solution.
Which is a decent definition of the EVP – and Hypothesis #8 Most attention by HR depts and their employer marketing agency is spent here. That’s understandable, if there’s a recruitment need, the platform is probably already well ablaze. But it’s the short term solution.
2. What
it’s important for the organisation to do, and which it isn’t seen to deliver
well on now.
Which is a decent definition for an HR strategic plan – and Hypothesis #9 Often HR is doing lots of things it doesn’t get full credit for. The communication, line management, cultural alignment just doesn’t allow it to be fully seen or understood
But more than this I
think it’s vital for: Hypothesis #10 Concentrate on celebrating what is good now, but it’s
just as important to making more things great in the future. So a bit of 1), and plenty of 2). After
all, giving the customers (in this case employees and potential employees) what
they want, how they want it, is how you build a great brand. And I’ll return to
an employer brand next time out.
Which is a decent definition for an HR strategic plan – and Hypothesis #9 Often HR is doing lots of things it doesn’t get full credit for. The communication, line management, cultural alignment just doesn’t allow it to be fully seen or understood
No comments:
Post a Comment